Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis - Revision history

Kcreasey at 13:19, 8 November 2023

2023-11-08T13:19:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 8 November 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself.		# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself.
	#* This only is implicit up until determinancy where self-relation is posited and explicitly exemplified in the concept of something - the first self-relating form of being		#* This only is implicit up until determinancy where self-relation is posited and explicitly exemplified in the concept of something - the first self-relating form of being
			Looking to see how this further develops for a reflective view through the Doctrine of Being and further develops under the Doctrines of Essence and Concept

Kcreasey at 15:08, 7 November 2023

2023-11-07T15:08:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 7 November 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis		# The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis
	# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself.		# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself.
			#* This only is implicit up until determinancy where self-relation is posited and explicitly exemplified in the concept of something - the first self-relating form of being

Kcreasey at 13:26, 7 November 2023

2023-11-07T13:26:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, 7 November 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	# A form of being (so an affirmative identity) as a kind of Thesis		# A form of being (so an affirmative identity) as a kind of Thesis
	# The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis		# The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis
	# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and ~~it's~~ negation in moments of itself.		# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself.

Kcreasey: Created page with "A common misconception is Hegel developed this as a form of process, but that is better attributed to Ficthe What does seem to occur, however, is that in going through the presuppositionalist process of letting the concepts further derive truth from itself, the above form does seem to derive out but also with a reason. Under doctrine of being thus far it seems to work as such: # A form of being (so an affirmative identity) as a kind of Thesis # The negation of being..."

2023-11-07T13:26:09Z

Created page with "A common misconception is Hegel developed this as a form of process, but that is better attributed to Ficthe What does seem to occur, however, is that in going through the presuppositionalist process of letting the concepts further derive truth from itself, the above form does seem to derive out but also with a reason. Under doctrine of being thus far it seems to work as such: # A form of being (so an affirmative identity) as a kind of Thesis # The negation of being..."

New page

A common misconception is Hegel developed this as a form of process, but that is better attributed to Ficthe

What does seem to occur, however, is that in going through the presuppositionalist process of letting the concepts further derive truth from itself, the above form does seem to derive out but also with a reason.

Under doctrine of being thus far it seems to work as such:

# A form of being (so an affirmative identity) as a kind of Thesis
# The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis
# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and it's negation in moments of itself.