Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis | # The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis | ||
# A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself. | # A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself. | ||
#* This only is implicit up until determinancy where self-relation is posited and explicitly exemplified in the concept of something - the first self-relating form of being | |||
Revision as of 10:08, 7 November 2023
A common misconception is Hegel developed this as a form of process, but that is better attributed to Ficthe
What does seem to occur, however, is that in going through the presuppositionalist process of letting the concepts further derive truth from itself, the above form does seem to derive out but also with a reason.
Under doctrine of being thus far it seems to work as such:
- A form of being (so an affirmative identity) as a kind of Thesis
- The negation of being into a negative identity - an abstraction as a kind of Antithesis
- A negation of negation as self-relating or self-negating negation which itself is a new form of being which is a Synthesis, as it is also taking the original form of being and its negation as moments within itself.
- This only is implicit up until determinancy where self-relation is posited and explicitly exemplified in the concept of something - the first self-relating form of being